Trump's Paris Accord Pullout; India's Slowing Economy; Kabul Blast; Panama JIT

Why did President Trump pull the United States out of the Paris Climate Deal? How will this impact the United States and the world? Can US still lead on matters related to energy? Will China and Europe pick up the mantle of world leadership on climate change and clean energy? Will US growing isolation cost American jobs?

Why has India's GDP growth slowed to 6.1% in Jan-March 2017 from 7.1% earlier? Is it the result of demonetization? Why has bank credit growth declined to just 5%, the slowest in 60 years? Is the growth in non-performing loans taking a toll on new lending by ailing public sector banks? How will it affect job growth in India?

Who is responsible for the massive Kabul blast that caused tragic loss of 100 lives? Did the Haqqanis do it? Why is the Afghan intelligence blaming it on Pakistan? How will the United States deal with the deteriorating situation after 16 years of war in Afghanistan? Will the Taliban accept talking with the Afghan and US representatives?

Does PMLN Senator Nihal Hashmi's scathing attack on judiciary and bureaucracy reflect the inner thinking within the Sharif family and the PMLN leadership? Is it an attempt to intimidate the judges and the bureaucrats involved investigating corruption allegations against Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his family members? Are they having a hard time dealing with accountability as never seen before by a ruling party in Pakistan?

Viewpoint From Overseas host Faraz Darvesh discusses these questions with Ali H. Cemendtaur and Riaz Haq (

Related Links:

Haq's Musings

Trump's Policies

Pakistan's Response to Climate Change

Is Modi Fudging Indian GDP Figures? 

India's Demonetization Disaster

Gen Petraeus on Pakistan's Support of Haqqanis

Panama Leaks Corruption Scandal

Talk4Pak Youtube Channel


Riaz Haq said…
Global Growth Set to Strengthen to 2.7 percent as Outlook Brightens
June 4, 2017

South Asia. Regional growth is projected to remain
strong, at 6.8 percent in 2017. India is recovering from
the temporary adverse effects of the end-2016
withdrawal of large-denomination currency notes.
Elsewhere in the region, growth in Pakistan is
accelerating this year, largely driven by robust domestic
demand and improved foreign direct investment, while
activity in Bangladesh is moderating, reflecting a
pullback in domestic demand and in industrial
production. Regional growth is expected to firm in
2018-19, reaching an average of 7.2 percent, supported
by robust domestic demand, an uptick in exports, and
strong foreign direct investment. The regional outlook
has been slightly revised down from January, reflecting
a more protracted recovery in private investment in
India than previously expected. Risks to the outlook are
tilted to the downside and include reforms setbacks,
geopolitical tensions, and policy uncertainty.

Regional output expanded by an estimated 6.7
percent in 2016, despite temporary disruptions
associated with the November withdrawal and
replacement of large-denomination currency notes
in India, the region’s largest economy (Table
2.5.1). In general, South Asian economies
benefitted from an improvement in exports, low
oil prices, infrastructure spending, and supportive
macroeconomic policies last year. In India, activity
was underpinned by favorable monsoon rains that
supported agriculture and rural consumption, an
increase in infrastructure spending, and robust
government consumption (World Bank 2017l). In
Pakistan, agricultural output rebounded following
the end of a drought, while the successful
completion of an IMF-supported program
enhanced macroeconomic conditions and foreign
direct investment (FDI). Nepal’s economy
suffered from lingering effects of the 2015
earthquake and trade disruptions with India
(World Bank 2017m). However, in some
countries, activity in 2016 was set back by a sharp
decline in remittances inflows (e.g., Bangladesh;
World Bank 2016g), inclement weather
conditions that reduced agricultural output (e.g.,
Sri Lanka), and security challenges (e.g.,

A pickup in regional growth is underway in 2017.
In India, recent data indicate a rebound this year,
with the easing of cash shortages and rising
exports (World Bank 2017l). An increase in
government spending in India, including on
capital formation, has partially offset soft private
investment. While manufacturing Purchasing
Managers’ Indexes have generally picked up,
industrial production has been mixed (Figure
2.5.1). In Pakistan, favorable weather and
increased cotton prices are supporting agricultural
production, and the China-Pakistan Economic
Corridor infrastructure project, as well as a stable
macroeconomic environment, is contributing to
an increase in private investment.

Regional growth is
forecast to increase to 6.8 percent in 2017 and to
strengthen to an average of 7.2 percent in 2018-
19, reflecting a solid expansion of domestic
demand and exports (Figure 2.5.2). Excluding
India, regional growth will remain broadly stable
at an average of 5.8 percent in 2017-19, as easing
growth in Bangladesh and Nepal offset gains in
Bhutan, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.

A number of downside risks continue to cloud the
outlook. Setbacks to the assumed pace of
structural reform would impede the unlocking of
supply constraints, dampen productivity growth,
and hold up integration into global value chains.
This would hurt the business environment,
reducing investment and FDI inflows to the
region (IMF 2017d, 2017e). Security concerns in
some countries (e.g., Afghanistan, Pakistan) could
also hold back investment and business
Riaz Haq said…
Forget GDP, worry about the financial state of our states

June 4, 2017, 12:02 AM IST Nalin Mehta in Academic Interest | Economy, India | TOI

While all attention has been focused on Modi sarkar, many of our states have been borrowing money like there is no tomorrow. Reserve Bank of India (RBI) recently reported that the debt-to-state GDP ratio of as many as 17 Indian states increased in the past year. For all states taken together, this ratio hit an alarming 3.6% in 2015-16 (breaching the mandated 3% ceiling under fiscal prudence rules) for the first time in 10 years. As RBI put it, “The consolidated finances of states has deteriorated in recent years…information on 25 states indicates that improvement in fiscal metrics budgeted by states for 2016-17 may not materialise.”
This matters because it is state governments that really control most things that touch us directly — from land, electricity and water to schools, hospitals and state highways — and when foreign investors see India they don’t just see the central government but the combined health of the Centre and the states.
So, which states have a real problem with managing their money? Uttar Pradesh is a big challenge for newly minted CM Yogi Adityanath, with its gross fiscal deficit to gross state domestic product ratio in 2015-16 going up to 5.6% (up from 3.1% the previous year). For Rajasthan, this ratio is a whopping 10% (up from 3.1%), Haryana 6.3 %(up from 2.9%), Bihar 6.9% (up from 3%), Madhya Pradesh 3.9% (up from 2.4%) and Goa 6.8% (up from 2.3%).
Why does this matter to anyone other than accountants? Crudely put, the more a state borrows, the more it must pay back each year with interest — somewhat like your annual house EMIs — leaving lesser money to spend on development spending. This partly explains why 17 major states in the current financial year, according to a study quoted in TOI this week, have budgeted for a 10.8% rise in spending (compared to 19% last year) making it the slowest pace of increase in 13 years.
Riaz Haq said…
#California Signs #ClimateChange Agreement With #China after #Trump's #ParisAccord pullout via @IFLScience:

The rebellion is in full swing, and it seems the Paris agreement was the catalyst.

First came the Climate Alliance, a bipartisan group of Governors determined to uphold the pact despite the actions of the Executive Branch. Then came “We Are Still In,” a coalition of US states, businesses, and cities – representing one-third of the American population – that told the UN that they are still abiding by Paris.

Now, Governor Jerry Brown of California, one of the co-chairs of the Climate Alliance, has taken this one shocking step further. During his current tour of China, and shortly before meeting with President Xi Jinping, he signed an agreement with China that would see the rising superpower and the Golden State work together on cutting their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions over time.

From renewable energy technologies to zero-emission vehicles, from low carbon infrastructures to electricity efficiency savings, both China and California will work closely together. A working group of top-level officials from both sides will continually plot ways to cooperate on climate measures and to zero in on initiatives that will help both countries cut their carbon footprints.

China has already shown over the last couple of years that it is serious when it comes to climate change mitigation. Although far from perfect, the world’s most prolific GHG emitter is investing heavily in wind, solar, and nuclear power and its coal production has reached a plateau. Ambitious, enormous clean energy projects by state-owned corporations are underway across the globe.

In this respect, California – a progressive pioneer in clean energy since the 1980s, and home to nearly 40 million people, more than most countries – is China’s natural ally on the subject. The two may disagree about many other things, but on their frustration with the President, and their work on climate change, they have mutual goals.

Upon signing the agreement early today with Wan Gang, the Chinese minister for science and technology, Brown reminded the world that the power of states should not be underestimated.

“California is the leading economic state in America and we are also the pioneering state on clean technology, cap and trade, electric vehicles and batteries, but we can’t do it alone,” Brown said before a Chinese delegation.

Secretary of Energy Rick Perry was also at the meeting in Beijing. Despite quietly hoping that the President would stay in the Paris agreement, he’s happily going along with Trump’s decision to withdraw. This surprise announcement by Governor Brown must have come as quite a shock to him.

This is nothing short of a powerful rebuke to Trump, and Brown knows it. It’s increasingly looking like it’s not America alone on the world stage – it’s the President.

Riaz Haq said…
JIT recommends filing of reference against PM Nawaz, daughter and sons with NAB

"Significant gap/disparity among the known and declared sources of income and the wealth accumulated by the Respondent No. 1, 6, 7 and 8 have been observed," said the investigation team in its closing remarks.

In the report, Respondent 1 refers to Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, Respondent 6 refers to Maryam Nawaz, Respondent 7 refers to Hussain Nawaz and Respondent 8 to Hasan Nawaz.

“The financial structure and health of the companies in Pakistan having linkages to the Respondents also do not substantiate the wealth of Respondents,” added the document.

"Moreover, irregular movement of huge amounts in shape of loans and gifts from Kingdom of Saudi Arabia-based company (Hill Metals Establishment), United Kingdom based companies (Flagship Investments Limited and others) and United Arab Emirates based Company (Capital FZE) to Respondent No. 1, Respondent No. 7 and Pakistan based companies of Respondent No. 1 and family have been highlighted."

"The role of off-shore companies is critically important as several offshore companies [companies mentioned by name] have been identified to be linked with their businesses in UK while conducting this investigation. These companies were mainly used for inflow of funds into UK based companies; which not only acquired expensive properties in UK from such funds but also revolve these funds amongst their companies of UK, KSA, UAE and Pakistan."

"In addition to the companies, Respondent No. 1 and 7 have been found to be recipients of these funds movement into Pakistan as gifts/loans whose purpose/reason have not justified by them before the JIT. Needless to say, these UK companies were loss-making entities with heavily engaged in revolving of funds vis-a-vis creating a smoke screen that the expensive properties of UK were due to the business operations of these UK companies," added the closing remarks.

The investigative team refers to Section 9(a)(v) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 in its report, which states - "A holder of public office, or any other person, is said to commit or to have committed the offence of corruption and corrupt practices [....] if he or any of his dependents or benamidars owns and possesses or has acquired right or title to any assets or holds irrevocable power of attorney in respect of any assets or pecuniary resources disproportionate to his known sources of income, which he cannot reasonably account for or maintains a standard of assets beyond that which is commensurate with his sources of income...."

"In any trial of an offence punishable under clause (v) of sub-section (a) of Section 9 of this Ordinance, the fact that the accused person on his behalf, is in possession for which the accused person cannot satisfactorily account, of assets and pecuniary resources disproportionate to his known sources of income, or that such person has, at or about the time of the commission of the offence with which he is charged, obtained an accretion to his pecuniary resources or property for which he cannot satisfactorily account, the Court shall presume, unless the contrary is proved, that the accused person is guilty of the offence of corruption and corrupt practices and his conviction therefore shall not be invalid by reason only that it is based solely on such presumption," states Section 14(c) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, which was also brought forth by the report.

Popular posts from this blog

Pakistani Women's Growing Particpation in Workforce

Project Azm: Pakistan to Develop 5th Generation Fighter Plane

Pakistan's Saadia Zahidi Leads World Economic Forum's Gender Parity Effort