Facts and Myths in Globalization Debate
It is becoming increasingly important for nations to build knowledge-based economies to effectively compete and win in a globalized world. Here is a presentation by Vivek Wadhwa, a Duke professor, discussing facts and myths in the globalization debate:
Related Links:
Dr. Ataur Rehman Defends Higher Education Reforms
Higher Education Transformation in Pakistan
Pakistan's Choice: Globalization or Talibanization
Pakistan's $2.8 Billion IT Industry
President Musharraf's Legacy
Education in Pakistan
Reforms? What Reforms? by Pervez Hoodbhoy
India's New Millennium in Science
Higher Education Transformation in Pakistan
Nature's Coverage of Higher Education Reform
Asia Gains in World's Top Universities
Poor Quality of Higher Education in South Asia
Dr. Pervez Hoodbhoy's Letter to Nature
Wadhwa
View more documents from South Asian Studies Association.
Related Links:
Dr. Ataur Rehman Defends Higher Education Reforms
Higher Education Transformation in Pakistan
Pakistan's Choice: Globalization or Talibanization
Pakistan's $2.8 Billion IT Industry
President Musharraf's Legacy
Education in Pakistan
Reforms? What Reforms? by Pervez Hoodbhoy
India's New Millennium in Science
Higher Education Transformation in Pakistan
Nature's Coverage of Higher Education Reform
Asia Gains in World's Top Universities
Poor Quality of Higher Education in South Asia
Dr. Pervez Hoodbhoy's Letter to Nature
Comments
Even Andy Grove, former Intel CEO, believes outsourcing has been a disaster for America:
Such evidence stares at us from the performance of several Asian countries in the past few decades. These countries seem to understand that job creation must be the No. 1 objective of state economic policy. The government plays a strategic role in setting the priorities and arraying the forces and organization necessary to achieve this goal. The rapid development of the Asian economies provides numerous illustrations. In a thorough study of the industrial development of East Asia, Robert Wade of the London School of Economics found that these economies turned in precedent-shattering economic performances over the '70s and '80s in large part because of the effective involvement of the government in targeting the growth of manufacturing industries.
And:
However, our pursuit of our individual businesses, which often involves transferring manufacturing and a great deal of engineering out of the country, has hindered our ability to bring innovations to scale at home. Without scaling, we don't just lose jobs -- we lose our hold on new technologies. Losing the ability to scale will ultimately damage our capacity to innovate.
http://www.drudge.com/archive/136003/intel-exec-outsourcing-national-suicide
...."Knowledge work", supposedly the west's salvation, is now being exported like manual work. A global mass market in unskilled labour is being quickly succeeded by a market in middle-class work, particularly for industries, such as electronics, in which so much hope of employment opportunities and high wages was invested. As supply increases, employers inevitably go to the cheapest source. A chip designer in India costs 10 times less than a US one. The neoliberals forgot to read (or re-read) Marx. "As capital accumulates the situation of the worker, be his payment high or low, must grow worse."
We are familiar with the outsourcing of routine white-collar "back office" jobs such as data inputting. But now the middle office is going too. Analysing X-rays, drawing up legal contracts, processing tax returns, researching bank clients, and even designing industrial systems are examples of skilled jobs going offshore. Even teaching is not immune: last year a north London primary school hired mathematicians in India to provide one-to-one tutoring over the internet. Microsoft, Siemens, General Motors and Philips are among big firms that now do at least some of their research in China. The pace will quicken. The export of "knowledge work" requires only the transmission of electronic information, not factories and machinery. Alan Blinder, a former vice-chairman of the US Federal Reserve, has estimated that a quarter of all American service sector jobs could go overseas.
Western neoliberal "flat earthers" (after Thomas Friedman's book) believed jobs would migrate overseas in an orderly fashion. Some skilled work might eventually leave but, they argued, it would make space for new industries, requiring yet higher skills and paying better wages. Only highly educated westerners would be capable of the necessary originality and adaptability. Developing countries would obligingly wait for us to innovate in new areas before trying to compete.
But why shouldn't developing countries leapfrog the west? Asia now produces more scientists and engineers than the EU and the US put together. By 2012, on current trends, the Chinese will patent more inventions than any other nation. As a new book – The Global Auction (by sociologists Phillip Brown, Hugh Lauder and David Ashton) – argues, the next generation of innovative companies may not be American or British and, even if they are, they may not employ American or British workers.
It suggests neoliberals made a second, perhaps more important error. They assumed "knowledge work" would always entail the personal autonomy, creativity and job satisfaction to which the middle classes were accustomed. They did not understand that, as the industrial revolution allowed manual work to be routinised, so in the electronic revolution the same fate would overtake many professional jobs. Many "knowledge skills" will go the way of craft skills. They are being chopped up, codified and digitised. Every high street once had bank managers who used their discretion and local knowledge to decide which customers should receive loans. Now software does the job. Human judgment is reduced to a minimum, which explains why loan applicants are often denied because of some tiny, long-forgotten overdue payment.
Brown, Lauder and Ashton call this "digital Taylorism"....